§

Lenroc Co. v. Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc.

11787477 (P.T.A.B. Jul. 24, 2014)
Lenroc Co. v. Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Resources, Inc.

    279 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]here an accused infringer is clearly practicing only that which was in the prior art, and nothing more, and the patentee's proffered construction reads on the accused device, meeting burden of [establishing invalidity] should not prove difficult"

  2. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Mustek Systems, Inc.

    340 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2003)   Cited 110 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding it was error for district court to grant judgment as a matter of law on ground not raised in Rule 50(b) motion

  3. Kumar v. Ovonic Battery Co., Inc.

    351 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2003)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that "prior art cited in a patent or cited in the prosecution history of the patent constitutes intrinsic evidence"

  4. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 405 times   192 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  5. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 377 times   633 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  6. Section 42.100 - Procedure; pendency

    37 C.F.R. § 42.100   Cited 192 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the PTAB gives " claim . . . its broadest reasonable construction in light of the specification of the patent in which it appears"

  7. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 46 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution