§
Lampi LLC

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 655 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Medeco Sec. Locks v. National Lab. rel

    142 F.3d 733 (4th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no substantial evidence of knowledge could be inferred from the company's decision to fire a worker within a year after he had ceased to be a visible supporter of the union and had disavowed further interest in the union

  4. BE & K Construction Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1372 (11th Cir. 1997)   Cited 11 times

    No. 96-6776. Filed October 27, 1997. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Alabama Case). (NLRB No. Before BIRCH, Circuit Judge, FAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and COHILL, Senior District Judge. Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr., Senior U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: In this labor case, BE K Construction Company ("BE K") petitions for review and the National Labor Relations

  5. Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    126 F.3d 246 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 96-1572 96-1604. Argued March 5, 1997. Decided September 11, 1997. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (6-CA-26669) ARGUED: Steven Robert Wall, MORGAN, LEWIS BOCKIUS, L.L.P., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioners. Jill Ann Griffin, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Barry E. Gosin, MORGAN, LEWIS BOCKIUS, L.L.P., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioners. Frederick L. Feinstein

  6. Holo-Krome Co. v. N.L.R.B

    907 F.2d 1343 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 14 times
    Holding the Board's use of employer's protected expressions of opinion against union as a basis for finding animus to be contrary to section 8(c)

  7. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. v. GATX LOGISTICS

    160 F.3d 353 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times

    No. 97-2783. Argued February 24, 1998. Decided September 4, 1998. Published October 30, 1998. This decision was originally issued as an unpublished order. The National Labor Relations Board subsequently filed a motion requesting publication pursuant to Circuit Rule 53(d)(3). The panel has granted that motion, and accordingly its decision is now being re-issued as a published opinion. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board Case No. 33-CA-11015 Christopher W.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    375 F.2d 497 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times

    No. 16996. April 7, 1967. Clarice Feldman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. David E. Burgess, Detroit, Mich., MacFarlane, Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondents. Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. CECIL, Senior

  9. Corriveau Routhier Cement Block v. N.L.R.B

    410 F.2d 347 (1st Cir. 1969)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 7194. May 5, 1969. Alan Hall, Manchester, N.H., with whom Richard C. Kohls and Wadleigh, Langdell Starr, Peters Dunn, Manchester, N.H., were on the brief, for petitionent. Robert E. Williams, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William F. Wachter, Atty., were on the brief, for responder. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE, Circuit Judge

  10. Rule 611 - Mode and Order of Examining Witnesses and Presenting Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 611   Cited 1,944 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Granting trial judge broad discretion to control witness examination