§

L. D. Kichler Co.

335 N.L.R.B. 1427 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
L. D. Kichler Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 277 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

  2. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

  3. Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.

    525 U.S. 813 (1998)   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 97-1846. October 5, 1998. ORDERS C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 130 F. 3d 1101.

  4. United Paperworkers Int'l. Union v. Buzenius

    525 U.S. 979 (1998)   Cited 21 times

    No. 97-945. November 9, 1998. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Marquez v. Screen Actors, ante, p. 33. Reported below: 124 F. 3d 788.

  5. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 24 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"

  6. Penrod v. N.L.R.B

    203 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 13 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Hudson requires a union to explain how its affiliate used money that was ultimately charged to the nonmembers

  7. Sheet Metal Workers' Int'l Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    716 F.2d 1249 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 26 times
    Holding summary judgment should be denied "where the movant's papers are insufficient on their face or themselves demonstrate the existence of a material issue of fact"

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Monson Trking

    204 F.3d 822 (8th Cir. 2000)   Cited 8 times
    Explaining that § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act limits "[o]ur jurisdiction"

  9. Production Workers Union of Chicago & Vicinity, Local 707 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    161 F.3d 1047 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 8 times
    Explaining that appellate court cannot review an argument first raised on appeal unless "extraordinary circumstances" are present

  10. Buzenius v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    124 F.3d 788 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 4 times

    No. 96-5139 Argued: February 7, 1997 Decided and Filed: September 8, 1997 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 John C. Scully, (argued and briefed), National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA, for Petitioner. Aileen A. Armstrong, (briefed), Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Deborah E. Shrager, (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court Branch, Washington, DC, Margaret Gaines Neigus, (briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent