§

Kuhlke Bergsman Ritchie*

No. 85321532 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 14, 2013)
Kuhlke Bergsman Ritchie*

5 Cited authorities

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 190 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  2. In re Majestic Distilling Co., Inc.

    315 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2003)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that malt liquor and tequila sold under the same mark would cause a likelihood of confusion

  3. Canada Dry Corp. v. Am. Home Products Corp.

    468 F.2d 207 (C.C.P.A. 1972)   Cited 2 times

    October 26, 1972. Francis J. Sullivan, attorney of record, for appellant. Mortimer Altin, Julius A. Bell, New York City, attorneys of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN, and LANE, Judges. ALMOND, Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 164 USPQ 154, dismissing appellant's opposition upon the ground that registration of the trademark in question is not reasonably likely

  4. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,882 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  5. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,599 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"