KINGSPAN INSULATED PANELS, d/b/a KINGSPAN BENCHMARK

3 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
  2. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wis-Pak Foods, Inc.

    125 F.3d 518 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 7 times
    Upholding the NLRB's determination that the post-election grant of a wage increase was motivated by a desire to erode union support and was therefore an unfair labor practice