§
Key Food

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Bridgeport v. Assn. Against Discrim

    455 U.S. 988 (1982)   Cited 138 times
    Granting summary judgment in defendant's favor in antitrust case, finding "no significant probative evidence of a conspiracy"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  5. Silverman v. J.R.L. Food Corp.

    196 F.3d 334 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 26 times
    Reversing finding of no reasonable cause, noting that the district court "did not accord [the ALJ's] decision appropriate deference"

  6. Abbey's Transp. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    837 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 25 times
    Finding violation when interrogator was a "lawyer-consultant"

  7. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  8. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Downslope Industries, Inc.

    676 F.2d 1114 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 13 times

    No. 80-1237. Argued February 2, 1982. Decided April 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Christine Weiner, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Alan B. Pearl and Henry C. Woicik, Consol. Corporate Consultants, Inc., Jericho, N. Y., for respondents. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge. Honorable Anna Diggs Taylor, District Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

  10. N.L.R.B. v. M B Headwear Co.

    349 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 21 times
    Stating that a "substantial evidence" challenge presented a "familiar question"