§
KARD-TV

8 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 872 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armato

    199 F.2d 800 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 38 times

    No. 10691. November 19, 1952. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.S. Hoebreckx and Clark M. Robertson, Robertson Hoebreckx, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. LINDLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the provisions

  4. Winter Garden Citrus Pr. Coop. v. N.L.R.B

    238 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 17 times
    In Winter Garden Citrus Products Cooperative v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 238 F.2d 128, upon finding that such causal connection was not shown, the court refused to enforce the order requiring reinstatement.

  5. Rubin Bros. Footwear v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    203 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times
    In Rubin Bros. Footwear v. National Labor Relations Bd., 203 F.2d 486 (C.C.A. 5th), the Court said: "If anything is settled in labor law and under the act, we think it is that membership in a union does not guarantee the member against a discharge as such. It affords protection against discharge only where it is established that the discharge is because of union activity."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Roure-Dupont Mfg., Inc.

    199 F.2d 631 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 8 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Roure-Dupont Mfg., 199 F.2d 631 (2d Cir. 1952), the court found the strikers' jobs had been absorbed when vacancies occurred one month after the strike ended.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Spitzer Motor Sales

    211 F.2d 235 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 2 times

    No. 203, Docket 22853. Argued March 10, 1954. Decided March 24, 1954. Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Arthur Kaplan, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA, and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The objections raised to enforcement

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Waumbec Mills

    114 F.2d 226 (1st Cir. 1940)   Cited 10 times

    No. 3528. August 20, 1940. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding on motion by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against Waumbec Mills, Inc., under the National Labor Relations Act § 10(e), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e). Order modified, and motion for enforcement of order granted. Thomas E. Harris, Department of Justice, of Washington, D.C. (Charles Fahy, Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Mortimer B. Wolf, and Alvin Rockwell, all