Kaplan, Sicking, Hessen, etc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop

    440 U.S. 490 (1979)   Cited 459 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction
  3. Garner v. Teamsters Union

    346 U.S. 485 (1953)   Cited 690 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nash-Finch Co.

    404 U.S. 138 (1971)   Cited 163 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that board's attempt to "enjoin" or "restrain" state court injunction fell within exception of 28 U.S.C. § 2283, which forbids court from granting "an injunction to stay" such proceedings unless otherwise authorized
  5. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support
  6. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
  7. Bethlehem Co. v. State Board

    330 U.S. 767 (1947)   Cited 255 times
    Holding federal nonregulation was not an "administrative concession that the nature of these appellants’ business put" the particular subject matter "beyond reach of federal authority"
  8. Labor Board v. Reliance Fuel Corp.

    371 U.S. 224 (1963)   Cited 133 times
    In Reliance Fuel Oil Corp., the Board found that Reliance Fuel Oil Corp. ("Reliance"), a New York corporation engaged in the business of selling fuel oil for heating purposes and servicing oil burners and boilers, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the NLRA because it had "purchased a substantial amount of fuel oil from Gulf, a company concededly engaged in interstate commerce."
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Wheeling Electric Company

    444 F.2d 783 (4th Cir. 1971)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Wheeling Electric Co., 444 F.2d 783 (4th Cir. 1971), we faced an analogous question pertaining to the status of confidential secretaries.
  10. N.L.R.B. v. David Buttrick Company

    361 F.2d 300 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 10 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. David Buttrick Co., 361 F.2d 300 (1st Cir. 1966) (Buttrick I), a milk distributor, Buttrick, had refused to bargain with Local 380 because of loans totaling $4,700,000 made by the Fund to Whiting.