Kansas AFL-CIO

8 Cited authorities

Buckley v. Valeo
424 U.S. 1 (1976) Cited 3,471 times 41 Legal Analyses
Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop
440 U.S. 490 (1979) Cited 460 times 48 Legal Analyses
Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
452 U.S. 666 (1981) Cited 270 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons
Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board
353 U.S. 1 (1957) Cited 233 times
Holding that state-law claims are preempted even when the NLRB refuses to assume jurisdiction
H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal Analyses
In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
Associated Press v. Labor Board
301 U.S. 103 (1937) Cited 257 times
Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"
Office Employes v. Labor Board
353 U.S. 313 (1957) Cited 54 times
Holding that, when a union acts as an employer, it is deemed an employer within the meaning of the NLRA and subject to the jurisdiction of the NLRB

Kansas AFL-CIO

8 Cited authorities

Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression

Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

Holding that state-law claims are preempted even when the NLRB refuses to assume jurisdiction

In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"

Holding that, when a union acts as an employer, it is deemed an employer within the meaning of the NLRA and subject to the jurisdiction of the NLRB