Jung Sun Laundry Group Corp.

14 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
ITT CONTINENTAL BAK. v. WILLIAM INGLIS SONS BAK
459 U.S. 825 (1982) Cited 254 times
Finding it unnecessary to reach that issue
Labor Board v. Insurance Agents
361 U.S. 477 (1960) Cited 325 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 233 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Chicago Typographical v. Chicago Sun-Times
935 F.2d 1501 (7th Cir. 1991) Cited 123 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that even where interpretive route is not spelled out or there is an "error in interpretation," the award stands as long as there is a "possible interpretive route to the award"
American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968) Cited 102 times 1 Legal Analyses
Applying Taft
Dilling Mechanical Contractors v. N.L.R.B
107 F.3d 521 (7th Cir. 1997) Cited 22 times
Nos. 95-3407 and 95-3641 ARGUED SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 DECIDED FEBRUARY 21, 1997 Michael L. Einterz (argued), Indianapolis, IN, for Dilling Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Aileen A. Armstrong, Peter D. Winkler, Vincent Falvo (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Walter Steele, National Labor Relations Board, Indianapolis, IN, for National Labor Relations Board. William R. Groth, Fillenwarth, Dennerline, Groth Towe, Indianapolis, IN, for Indiana
Richmond Recording Corp. v. N.L.R.B
836 F.2d 289 (7th Cir. 1987) Cited 30 times
Asserting that an impasse does not exist unless "[b]oth parties ... believe that they are at the end of their rope"
Teamsters Local Union No. 639 v. N.L.R.B
924 F.2d 1078 (D.C. Cir. 1991) Cited 24 times
Holding that brevity of parties' negotiations on issue and union's position that it still "had more movement to make" undermine employer's declaration of impasse

Jung Sun Laundry Group Corp.

14 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Finding it unnecessary to reach that issue

Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Holding that even where interpretive route is not spelled out or there is an "error in interpretation," the award stands as long as there is a "possible interpretive route to the award"

Applying Taft

Asserting that an impasse does not exist unless "[b]oth parties ... believe that they are at the end of their rope"

Holding that brevity of parties' negotiations on issue and union's position that it still "had more movement to make" undermine employer's declaration of impasse