§

Jules Jurgensen/ Rhapsody, Inc. v. Fabrica di Orologi Sindaco S.A. et al.

CANC (T.T.A.B. Aug. 13, 1997)
Jules Jurgensen/ Rhapsody, Inc. v. Fabrica di Orologi Sindaco S.A. et al.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Cerveceria Centroamericana v. Cerveceria

    892 F.2d 1021 (Fed. Cir. 1989)   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in the absence of evidence of intent to resume use during the period of non-use, the TTAB "may conclude the registrant has . . . failed to rebut the presumption of abandonment," even when there is evidence of intent to resume after the period of nonuse

  2. Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina

    670 F.2d 1024 (C.C.P.A. 1982)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that admission contained in an answer was binding, despite the fact that it was made "on information and belief"

  3. Wallpaper Mfrs. v. Crown Wallcovering Corp.

    680 F.2d 755 (C.C.P.A. 1982)   Cited 33 times
    Explaining "even where there is reverse confusion ... another source with superior de jure rights may prevail regardless of what source or sources the public identifies with the mark"

  4. Rule 19 - Required Joinder of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 19   Cited 9,801 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Holding a person must be joined if disposing the action in the person's absence may leave an existing party subject to a "substantial" risk of incurring inconsistent obligations

  5. Section 1064 - Cancellation of registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1064   Cited 921 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a petition to cancel a certification mark if the registered owner "discriminately refuses to certify" qualifying goods or services