Joint-Stock Company "Baik"

4 Cited authorities

University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co.
703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1983) Cited 19 times 2 Legal Analyses
In University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., 703 F.2d 1372, 1376, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. Cir. 1983), the court added that section 2(a) embraces concepts of the right to privacy which may be violated even in the absence of likelihood of confusion.
In re Etablissements Darty Et Fils
759 F.2d 15 (Fed. Cir. 1985) Cited 8 times
In Darty et Fils, however, even though, the primary question was whether "Darty" was primarily merely a surname, the Board had correctly held that the Opposers’ "provides no support for their contention."
Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Marzall
94 F. Supp. 254 (D.D.C. 1950) Cited 1 times
Civ. Nos. 1897, 5175. December 8, 1950. Cushman, Darby Cushman, Washington, D.C., C. Willard Hayes, Max Louis, Washington, D.C., Cyril A. Soans, William E. Anderson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for plaintiff. E.L. Reynolds, Sol., Washington, D.C., for defendant. KIRKLAND, District Judge. This case is a consolidation of two separate causes of action filed by the plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to register plaintiff's
Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration
15 U.S.C. § 1052 Cited 1,600 times 274 Legal Analyses
Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

Joint-Stock Company "Baik"

4 Cited authorities

University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co.

In University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., 703 F.2d 1372, 1376, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. Cir. 1983), the court added that section 2(a) embraces concepts of the right to privacy which may be violated even in the absence of likelihood of confusion.

In re Etablissements Darty Et Fils

In Darty et Fils, however, even though, the primary question was whether "Darty" was primarily merely a surname, the Board had correctly held that the Opposers’ "provides no support for their contention."

Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Marzall

Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"