§

JFB Manufacturing, Inc.

208 N.L.R.B. 2 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
JFB Manufacturing, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,683 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Eastern Greyhound Lines v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 15477. October 13, 1964. Theodore Voorhees, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner, Matthew J. Broderick, Philadelphia, Pa., Foster J. Fludine, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief. Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Dan Howard Mfg. Co.

    390 F.2d 304 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Dan Howard, supra, 390 F.2d at page 309, we further stated: "The court [Sixth Circuit] pointed out that it is relevant to consider the subjective intention of the signer and his expressed state of mind in deciding whether a misapprehension was knowingly induced."

  4. Jervis Corporation, Bolivar Div. v. N.L.R.B

    387 F.2d 107 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 14 times

    No. 17340. December 13, 1967. Clarence Clifton, and W. Kerby Bowling, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner, Richard A. Brackhaln, Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., on brief. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda Sher, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. WEICK

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Plaskolite, Inc.

    309 F.2d 788 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 4 times

    No. 14875. November 7, 1962. Vivian Asplund, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Helen F. Humphrey, Washington, D.C., for respondent, Samuel H. Porter, Columbus, Ohio, on the brief. Before CECIL, Chief Judge, WEICK, Circuit Judge, and PECK, District Judge. CECIL, Chief Judge. This case is before the Court on a petition