§

James Thompson & Co., Inc.

100 N.L.R.B. 456 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
James Thompson & Co., Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 232 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 179 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerset Classics

    193 F.2d 613 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 25 times

    No. 58, Docket 22081. Argued December 11, 1951. Decided January 14, 1952. Willis S. Ryza, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Dominick L. Manoli, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Walter J. Mahoney, of Buffalo, N.Y., and George Moskowitz, of New York City, for respondent Somerset Classics, Inc. Aaron L. Danzig

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Stackpole Carbon

    105 F.2d 167 (3d Cir. 1939)   Cited 36 times

    No. 6830. May 12, 1939. As Amended June 2, 1939. Rehearing Denied June 30, 1939. On Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board against the Stackpole Carbon Company. Order enforced except for portions stricken therefrom. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Laurence A. Knapp, Robert S. Erdahl, and David McCalmont, Jr., Attys., all of Washington

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. A. Sartorius Co.

    140 F.2d 203 (2d Cir. 1944)   Cited 19 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. A. Sartorius Co., 2 Cir., 140 F.2d 203, 205 we said that "if an administrative agency ignores all the evidence given by one side in a controversy and with studied design gives credence to the testimony of the other side, the findings would be arbitrary and not in accord with the legal requirement."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Mfg. Co.

    106 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1939)   Cited 23 times
    In American Manufacturing the court upheld the Board's finding that the discharges were discriminatory against union personnel since some of the persons who did not return to work were not discharged.

  8. Black Diamond S.S. Corp. v. Natl. Labor R. BD

    94 F.2d 875 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 24 times
    In Black Diamond S. S. Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 875, while an election was being held by the Board to determine which of two rival unions represented a majority of the men, one of the unions demanded that the company bargain with it.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Everett Van Kleeck

    189 F.2d 516 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 202, Docket 21903. Argued May 8, 1951. Decided May 31, 1951. George P. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Harvey B. Diamond and George H. Plaut, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Adolph Bangser, New York City, for respondent. Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The decision and order under review affirms the Trial Examiner's conclusion

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Karp Metal Products, Co.

    134 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1943)   Cited 9 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Karp Metal Products Co., 2 Cir., 134 F.2d 954 (decided after the Board had decided the case at bar) the employees testified that the union organizer induced them to sign by saying that the union already had a majority, or that it would get a majority, and that once it got it, the employee would lose his job.