Intl. Union Of Operating Engineers, Local 542

3 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  2. Seafarers International Un., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    265 F.2d 585 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 46 times

    No. 14373. Argued November 4, 1958. Decided January 29, 1959. Mr. C. Paul Barker, New Orleans, La., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Ray R. Murdock, Washington, D.C., and Seymour W. Miller, Brooklyn, N.Y., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, with whom Mr. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Mr. Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  3. Corrugated Asbestos Contractors, v. N.L.R.B

    458 F.2d 683 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 8 times
    Finding disclaimer effective because of union's "continued and adamant insistence" and holding that a union cannot be forced "to continue, against its wishes, a relationship that is in its very nature predicated upon voluntariness and consent"