9 Cited authorities
Mine Workers v. Pennington
381 U.S. 657 (1965) Cited 1,640 times 21 Legal AnalysesHolding that immunity extends to petitioning conduct “either standing alone or as part of a broader scheme”
Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.
381 U.S. 676 (1965) Cited 242 times 2 Legal AnalysesFinding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members
Truck Dvrs. Un. L. No. 413, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
334 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 56 timesNos. 17662, 17663. Argued October 30, 1963. Decided April 9, 1964. Certiorari Denied November 16, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 264. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,662. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,663. Mr. Gary Green, Atty
Orange Belt Dist. Coun. of Ptrs. v. N.L.R.B
328 F.2d 534 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 56 timesNo. 17388. Argued November 6, 1963. Decided January 30, 1964. Mr. Herbert M. Ansell, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for petitioners. Mr. David Barr, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioners. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board
Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
335 F.2d 709 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 44 timesSubcontracting in cases of lack of equipment to companies employing members of same local whenever possible
District No. 9 v. N.L.R.B
315 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1962) Cited 24 timesNo. 16901. Argued September 27, 1962. Decided November 15, 1962. Mr. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations
Lewis v. N.L.R.B
350 F.2d 801 (D.C. Cir. 1965) Cited 14 timesNos. 18863, 18952. Argued April 28, 1965. Decided August 4, 1965. Mr. M.E. Boiarsky, Charleston, W. Va., with whom Messrs. Welly K. Hopkins, Harrison Combs and Willard P. Owens, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 18863. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Miss Marion Griffin, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent in No.
Meat Hwy. Drivers, Etc., U. L. v. N.L.R.B
348 F.2d 803 (D.C. Cir. 1965)No. 18091. Filed July 6, 1965. Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, in Chambers. PER CURIAM: On September 11, 1964, this court decreed that "the Board's order, * * * insofar as it pertains to the work standards clause, is remanded to the Board for decision in the light of the Court's opinion." Instead of deciding the work standards clause issue on the record already made, the Board, on December 3, 1964, issued an order reopening the record and remanding the proceeding
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"