International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

16 Cited authorities

Board v. Hearst Publications
322 U.S. 111 (1944) Cited 791 times 8 Legal Analyses
Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")
Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.
309 U.S. 350 (1940) Cited 316 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal Analyses
In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
Hill v. Florida
325 U.S. 538 (1945) Cited 207 times
Finding that the filing requirement "in and of itself" does not conflict with the NLRA
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 178 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
Colgate Co. v. Labor Board
338 U.S. 355 (1949) Cited 36 times
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued November 17, 1949. Decided December 5, 1949. An employer and a labor organization entered into a closed-shop agreement which was valid under the National Labor Relations Act and under state law. The agreement, which the employer had entered into in good faith, was of indefinite duration and had been in effect more than four years. Pursuant to the agreement, upon the demand of the labor organization and in good
Labor Board v. Electric Cleaner Co.
315 U.S. 685 (1942) Cited 39 times
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 588. Argued March 5, 1942. Decided March 30, 1942. 1. The finding of the National Labor Relations Board that, by a supplementary oral contract between an employer and a labor union, it was agreed only that new employees would be required to join the union, was supported by substantial evidence. P. 690. 2. The conclusion of the Board that the closed-shop agreement between the employer and a labor union in this case was not valid
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.
169 F.2d 571 (6th Cir. 1948) Cited 46 times
In NLRB v. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F.2d 571, 577 (6th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 905, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441 (1949), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals specifically rejected the notion that the protection afforded by the National Labor Relations Act is a constitutional right.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Maritime Union of America
175 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1949) Cited 40 times
Bargaining for discriminatory hiring hall clause
Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd.
109 F.2d 9 (7th Cir. 1940) Cited 49 times
In Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (7th Cir. 1940) 109 F.2d 9, 21), the court stated: "But we are unable to comprehend how the Board could restore to the petitioner a right of which it had been deprived by the Trial Examiner — that is, a fair and impartial hearing.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

16 Cited authorities

Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

Finding that the filing requirement "in and of itself" does not conflict with the NLRA

In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

In NLRB v. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F.2d 571, 577 (6th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 905, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441 (1949), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals specifically rejected the notion that the protection afforded by the National Labor Relations Act is a constitutional right.

Bargaining for discriminatory hiring hall clause

In Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (7th Cir. 1940) 109 F.2d 9, 21), the court stated: "But we are unable to comprehend how the Board could restore to the petitioner a right of which it had been deprived by the Trial Examiner — that is, a fair and impartial hearing.