§

International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 617, Afl-Cio

281 N.L.R.B. 1226 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 617, Afl-Cio

13 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 633 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 734 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 116 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  5. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  6. Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n

    556 F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 88 times
    Refusing to rule on an injunction when a motion to clarify the injunction was pending in the district court

  7. Robertson v. Nat'l Basketball Ass'n

    67 F.R.D. 691 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)   Cited 89 times
    Rejecting as "patently meritless" argument that Norris-LaGuardia Act should be used to dissolve injunction that prevented the merger of two rival professional basketball leagues because Act "did not apply to an antitrust case"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. L. 264, Laborers' Intern. U

    529 F.2d 778 (8th Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times
    Determining that NLRB rule prescribing date of mailing as date of service is a valid and reasonable exercise of Board's authority

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    375 F.2d 497 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times

    No. 16996. April 7, 1967. Clarice Feldman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. David E. Burgess, Detroit, Mich., MacFarlane, Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondents. Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. CECIL, Senior

  10. Lone Star Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    639 F.2d 545 (10th Cir. 1980)   Cited 11 times

    No. 77-1667. Argued March 12, 1979. Decided July 28, 1980. Rehearing Denied September 5, 1980. Certiorari Denied February 23, 1981. Lynn P. Mattson, Tulsa, Okl. (Kothe, Nichols Wolfe, Inc., Tulsa, Okl., was on brief), for petitioner. David A. Fleischer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jay E. Shanklin, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were