§

Intel Corporation v. Steven Emeny

No. 91123312 (T.T.A.B. May. 15, 2007)
Intel Corporation v. Steven Emeny

7 Cited authorities

  1. Ritchie v. Simpson

    170 F.3d 1092 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding “real interest” is shown by “a direct and personal stake in the outcome” or a “legitimate personal interest.”

  2. Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina

    670 F.2d 1024 (C.C.P.A. 1982)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that admission contained in an answer was binding, despite the fact that it was made "on information and belief"

  3. Selva & Sons, Inc. v. Nina Footwear, Inc.

    705 F.2d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 27 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that challenger established standing under § 1064 notwithstanding the parties’ written agreement not to challenge each other's registration or each other's rights to use and sell goods under the mark

  4. Food Specialty Co. v. Standard Products

    406 F.2d 1397 (C.C.P.A. 1969)   Cited 3 times

    Patent Appeal No. 8110. March 13, 1969. Robert W. Beach, Seattle, Wash. (George R. Jones, Beale Jones, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. J. Hanson Boyden, D.C. Roylance, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, ALMOND and BALDWIN, Judges. RICH, Judge. This appeal is from a decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 151 USPQ 649 (1966), dismissing appellant's opposition to appellee's registration on the Principal Register of "Pretty Kitty"

  5. Gillette Company v. "42" Products LTD

    396 F.2d 1001 (C.C.P.A. 1968)   Cited 3 times

    Patent Appeal No. 7948. June 20, 1968. Rehearing Denied October 10, 1968. Rowland V. Patrick, Boston, Mass., Dos T. Hatfield, Washington, D.C., Charles C. Winchester, Boston, Mass., for appellant. William D. Sellers, Pasadena, Cal., Munson H. Lane, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge, and SMITH, ALMOND and KIRKPATRICK, Judges. Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. RICH, Judge. This appeal is from a decision of the Trademark Trial

  6. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,880 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  7. Section 2.106 - Answer

    37 C.F.R. § 2.106   Cited 12 times
    Defining compulsory counterclaim as "defense attacking the validity of any one or more of the registrations pleaded in the opposition"