Indian River Memorial Hospital
2 Cited authorities
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 270 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
N.L.R.B. v. United Technologies Corp.
884 F.2d 1569 (2d Cir. 1989) Cited 18 times 2 Legal AnalysesNos. 1095, 1096, Dockets 89-4003, 89-4009. Argued May 8, 1989. Decided September 13, 1989. Edward J. Dempsey, Director, Indus. Relations Labor Counsel, United Technologies Corp., Hartford, Conn., for respondent/intervenor United Technologies Corp. Judith P. Flower, Washington, D.C. (Barbara A. Atkin, Supervisory Attorney, Joseph E. Desio, Acting Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for