ยง
In the Matter of W

3 Cited authorities

  1. Edye v. Robertson

    112 U.S. 580 (1884)   Cited 360 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a per-head charge imposed on ship owners that brought immigrants to American was a processing fee or mitigation charge, and not a tax

  2. Whitney v. Robertson

    124 U.S. 190 (1888)   Cited 240 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if a treaty and a federal statute conflict, "the one last in date will control the other"

  3. Totus v. United States

    39 F. Supp. 7 (E.D. Wash. 1941)   Cited 8 times

    No. 64. May 28, 1941. E.A. Towner, of Portland, Or., for plaintiffs. Lyle Keith, U.S. Atty., of Spokane, Wash., for defendants. SCHWELLENBACH, District Judge. This is an action brought by Watson Totus and seventy (70) members of the Yakima Indian Tribe to restrain the defendants and each of them from enforcing the provisions of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix ยง 301 et seq., as against the plaintiffs or any other members of the Yakima Tribe. Defendants are the United