ยง
In the Matter of W

5 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of McDonald v. Sobel

    297 N.Y. 679 (N.Y. 1947)   Cited 57 times

    Argued September 29, 1947 Decided November 13, 1947 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, HALLINAN, J. Irwin N. Wilpon for appellant. Miles F. McDonald, District Attorney ( Solomon A. Klein of counsel), for respondent. Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion. Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ.

  2. People ex Rel. Romano v. Brophy

    20 N.E.2d 385 (N.Y. 1939)   Cited 14 times

    Submitted March 3, 1939 Decided April 11, 1939 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. Harry A. Wertlieb for appellant. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Patrick H. Clune and Edward T. Boyle of counsel), for respondent. CRANE, Ch. J. Appellant was convicted of the crime of assault in the second degree and was sentenced to a term of from two and one-half to five years for this offense and to a further term of from five to ten years for a violation of section 1944

  3. United States v. Karmuth

    1 F. Supp. 370 (N.D.N.Y. 1932)   Cited 10 times

    September 1, 1932. Morris I. Lipsitz, of Buffalo, N.Y., for relator. Oliver D. Burden, U.S. Atty., of Syracuse, N.Y., for respondent. COOPER, District Judge. This is a habeas corpus proceeding on behalf of the relator, Paul Valenti, held under warrant of deportation. The relator was born in Italy December 15, 1908, and came to this country with his parents October 28, 1914, and has ever since resided with them at Buffalo, attending school in that city, at least until June 16, 1924. It is asserted

  4. People v. Wein

    196 App. Div. 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)   Cited 4 times

    April 15, 1921. Benjamin I. Taylor, for the appellants. Lee Parsons Davis, District Attorney (Arthur Rowland, Assistant District Attorney, with him on the brief], for the respondent. PUTNAM, J.: The information charged defendants with the crime of assault in the third degree. The justice (sitting as a Court of Special Sessions) at the close dismissed the charge of assault, but found defendants guilty of disorderly conduct, and imposed a fine. Defendants have raised the point that disorderly conduct

  5. Dedieu v. the People

    22 N.Y. 178 (N.Y. 1860)   Cited 36 times
    In Dedieu v. People (22 N.Y. 178, 185), the court in construing a similar statutory provision (Rev. Stat. of N.Y., part 4, ch. 1, tit. 7, ยง 27), laid down the applicable rule as follows: 'upon an indictment for an offense consisting of different degrees, the jury may, in a case in other respects proper, find the accused not guilty in the degree charged, but guilty in any inferior degree of the same offense.