§

In the Matter of Torres

19 I&N Dec. 371 (B.I.A. 1986)
In the Matter of Torres

29 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning

  2. Rosenberg v. Fleuti

    374 U.S. 449 (1963)   Cited 241 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lawful permanent residents who travel abroad should be admitted, even if otherwise inadmissible, if their travel was "brief, casual, or innocent"

  3. Leng May Ma v. Barber

    357 U.S. 185 (1958)   Cited 213 times
    Holding that an alien's parole into the United States "did not alter her status as an excluded alien"

  4. Bagues-Valles v. I.N.S.

    779 F.2d 483 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that aliens are not precluded from raising due process claims on appeal that were not raised during administrative proceedings because the BIA has no jurisdiction to adjudicate constitutional issues

  5. Rogers v. Quan

    357 U.S. 193 (1958)   Cited 11 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 396. Argued May 20, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Respondents, natives of China, came to the United States between 1949 and 1954, seeking admission. All were paroled in the United States but have been ordered excluded. They applied for stays of deportation under § 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, on the ground that their deportation to China would subject them to physical persecution at the hands

  6. Silva v. Bell

    605 F.2d 978 (7th Cir. 1979)   Cited 22 times
    Determining method of reallocation

  7. Delgado-Carrera v. United States I.N.S.

    773 F.2d 629 (5th Cir. 1985)   Cited 12 times

    No. 85-4257. Summary Calendar. October 11, 1985. Eugenio Cazorla, Dallas, for petitioner. Robert L. Bombough, Dist. Dir., Office of Immigration Eloise Rosas, Atty. Litigation, Allen W. Hausman, Asst. Director, Linda B. Adams, Atty., Civ.Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Richard Chandler, Dist. Dir., Dallas, Tex., David Lambert, Dist. Dir., I.N.S., New Orleans, La., for other interested parties. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before

  8. Patel v. Landon

    739 F.2d 1455 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that an advance parolee should have been subject to deportation proceedings, rather than exclusion proceedings

  9. Castillo-Magallon v. I.N.S.

    729 F.2d 1227 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 11 times
    In Castillo-Magallon, the petitioners sought review in this court of an order excluding them from the United States, arguing that exclusion proceedings were improper since they were permanent resident aliens.

  10. Joshi v. District Director, I.N.S.

    720 F.2d 799 (4th Cir. 1983)   Cited 10 times
    Following grant of advance parole, BIA erred in adjudicating petitioner's application for adjustment of status in exclusionary proceedings

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,705 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,905 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens; referral for hearing

    8 U.S.C. § 1225   Cited 1,299 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Setting standard for credible fear as "a significant possibility, taking into account the ... statements made by the alien ... and such other facts as are known to the officer, that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum"

  14. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,132 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility

  15. Section 245.2 - Application

    8 C.F.R. § 245.2   Cited 500 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting USCIS authority to adjudicate applications for adjustment of status outside of removal proceedings

  16. Section 236.4 - Removal of S-5, S-6, and S-7 nonimmigrants

    8 C.F.R. § 236.4   Cited 5 times

    (a)Condition of classification. As a condition of classification and continued stay in classification pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(S) of the Act, nonimmigrants in S classification must have executed Form I-854, Part B, Inter-agency Alien Witness and Informant Record, certifying that they have knowingly waived their right to a removal hearing and right to contest, other than on the basis of an application for withholding of deportation or removal, any removal action, including detention pending