§

In the Matter of Swissair Flight SR 168

15 I&N Dec. 372 (B.I.A. 1975)
In the Matter of Swissair Flight SR 168

7 Cited authorities

  1. Richardson v. Perales

    402 U.S. 389 (1971)   Cited 56,545 times
    Holding that, when "presented with the not uncommon situation of conflicting medical evidence . . . [t]he trier of fact has the duty to resolve that conflict"

  2. Goldberg v. Kelly

    397 U.S. 254 (1970)   Cited 5,008 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process rights attach to the deprivation of Government benefits

  3. Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy

    367 U.S. 886 (1961)   Cited 1,792 times
    Holding that where plaintiff "remained entirely free to obtain employment" either with her employer or another employer, her liberty right in "follow[ing] a chosen trade or profession" was not implicated

  4. Blackwell College of Business v. Attorney General of United States

    454 F.2d 928 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 29 times
    In Blackwell, for example, the college's status as one that was approved by INS for attendance of nonimmigrant alien students was a valuable asset to the college.

  5. Cunard S.S. Co. v. Elting

    97 F.2d 373 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 9 times

    No. 316. June 6, 1938. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action to recover fines paid to the Collector of Customs of the Port of New York by the Cunard Steamship Company, Limited, against Philip Elting, Collector of Customs of the Port of New York, wherein the complaint was dismissed on two causes of action and the plaintiff was awarded recovery on two causes of action. From so much of the judgment as dismissed the complaint on two causes of

  6. Section 1323 - Unlawful bringing of aliens into United States

    8 U.S.C. § 1323   Cited 63 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the landing of stowaways except to receive temporary medical treatment

  7. Section 280.12 - Answer and request or order for interview

    8 C.F.R. § 280.12   Cited 4 times

    Within 30 days following the service of the Notice of Intention to Fine (which period the district director or the Associate Commissioner for Examinations, or the Director for the National Fines Office may extend for an additional period of 30 days upon good cause being shown), any person upon whom a notice under this part has been served may file with the district director or the Associate Commissioner for Examinations, or the Director for the National Fines Office a written defense, in duplicate