§

In the Matter of S.S. "ANNIK"

1 I&N Dec. 418 (B.I.A. 1943)
In the Matter of S.S. "ANNIK"

6 Cited authorities

  1. Boston Sand Co. v. United States

    278 U.S. 41 (1928)   Cited 177 times
    Finding plain meaning rule an axiom of experience rather than a rule of law

  2. Barrett v. Van Pelt

    268 U.S. 85 (1925)   Cited 75 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that loss not shown with regard to late delivery of a shipment of eggs where plaintiff did not establish date when eggs should have been delivered and market price on that date

  3. Van Camp Sons v. Am. Can Co.

    278 U.S. 245 (1929)   Cited 64 times
    Rejecting construction that section 2 only protected primary line competition between the discriminator and its competitors

  4. Compagnie Generale v. Elting

    298 U.S. 217 (1936)   Cited 16 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 6. Argued October 14, 1935. Decided May 18, 1936. 1. Section 20(a) of the Immigration Act of 1924 imposes a fine upon "the owner, charterer, agent, consignee or master" of any vessel arriving in the United States from any place outside, who fails to detain any alien seaman employed on such vessel, after inspection by the immigration officer in charge at the port of arrival, if required by such officer to do so. Held, that the

  5. Danciger v. Cooley

    248 U.S. 319 (1919)   Cited 33 times
    In Danciger v. Conley (248 U.S. 319, 326) the court in discussing the rule, among other things, said: "Its proper office is to give effect to the true intention of that body, not to defeat it."

  6. Lloyd Royal Belge Societe Anonyme v. Elting

    55 F.2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 1931)   Cited 4 times

    October 29, 1931. Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating McGrann, of New York City (Delbert M. Tibbetts, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff. George Z. Medalie, U.S. Atty., of New York City (George B. Schoonmaker, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant. Suit by the Lloyd Royal Belge Societe Anonyme against Philip Elting, Collector of Customs of the Port of New York. Verdict for defendant directed. See, also (D.C.) 51 F.2d 790. ROBERT P. PATTERSON, District Judge. Suit is brought to recover