§

In the Matter of S.S. "AEAS"

1 I&N Dec. 105 (B.I.A. 1941)
In the Matter of S.S. "AEAS"

3 Cited authorities

  1. Compagnie Generale v. Elting

    298 U.S. 217 (1936)   Cited 16 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 6. Argued October 14, 1935. Decided May 18, 1936. 1. Section 20(a) of the Immigration Act of 1924 imposes a fine upon "the owner, charterer, agent, consignee or master" of any vessel arriving in the United States from any place outside, who fails to detain any alien seaman employed on such vessel, after inspection by the immigration officer in charge at the port of arrival, if required by such officer to do so. Held, that the

  2. United States v. J.H. Winchester Co.

    40 F.2d 472 (2d Cir. 1930)   Cited 20 times
    In United States v. J.H. Winchester Co., 40 F.2d 472, there was an effort to subject the agent of a foreign ship to a fine for a failure to detain after inspection.

  3. British Empire Steam Nav. Co. v. Elting

    74 F.2d 204 (2d Cir. 1934)   Cited 9 times

    No. 39. December 10, 1934. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit by the British Empire Steam Navigation Company, Limited, against Philip Elting, as Collector of Customs of the Port of New York, to recover fines for violation of the Immigration Act of 1924, § 20 (8 USCA § 167). Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating McGrann, of New York City (Delbert M. Tibbetts and Joseph F. Luley, both of