§
In the Matter of S

4 Cited authorities

  1. Mahler v. Eby

    264 U.S. 32 (1924)   Cited 232 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government failed to comply "with all the statutory requirements"

  2. Daly v. Sperry Gyroscope Co.

    195 Misc. 169 (N.Y. Misc. 1949)   Cited 2 times

    May 3, 1949. Leonard P. Moore and John J. Kelly, Jr., for defendant. Sidney Schreiberg for plaintiff. SCHREIBER, J. Motion for partial summary judgment is granted. This plaintiff was employed by defendant from August 1, 1941, until March 30, 1946. This suit was instituted by a complaint verified April 21, 1947. The motion involves the effect of an agreement made in December, 1944, which agreement was indorsed on a check delivered by defendant to plaintiff and by him accepted. While plaintiff was

  3. Criterion Holding Co., Inc, v. Cerussi

    140 Misc. 855 (N.Y. Misc. 1931)   Cited 10 times
    In Criterion Holding Co. v. Cerussi (140 Misc. 855, 856), it was said: "It is true, of course, that duress is not established merely by proof that consent was procured on account of the pressure of financial circumstances.

  4. United States ex rel. Lubbers v. Reimer

    22 F. Supp. 573 (S.D.N.Y. 1938)   Cited 1 times

    22 F.Supp. 573 (S.D.N.Y. 1938) UNITED STATES ex rel. LUBBERS v. REIMER, Commissioner of Immigration. United States District Court, S.D. New York Feb. 4, 1938 Charles H. Winokur, of New York City, for petitioner. Lamar Hardy, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Jay Slonim, Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City., of counsel), for respondents. Samuel M. Finkelstein, of New York City, amicus curiae. GODDARD, District Judge. Habeas corpus proceedings by the United States, on the relation of Elfriede Lubbers, next