§
In the Matter of S

8 Cited authorities

  1. Estep v. United States

    327 U.S. 114 (1946)   Cited 737 times
    Upholding “no basis in fact” standard for jurisdictional facts and zero review for ordinary facts in criminal case

  2. Girouard v. United States

    328 U.S. 61 (1946)   Cited 211 times
    Holding that aliens "have no natural right to become citizens, but only that which is by statute conferred upon them. Because of the great value of the privileges conferred by naturalization, the statutes prescribing qualifications and governing procedure for admission are to be construed with definite purpose to favor and support the government. * * * [T]he law puts the burden upon every applicant to show by satisfactory evidence that he had the specified qualifications."

  3. Cox v. United States

    332 U.S. 442 (1947)   Cited 192 times
    In Cox v. United States, 332 U.S. 442, 452-453, 68 S.Ct. 115, 92 L.Ed. 59, the Supreme Court held that the claim of no basis in fact for a selective service classification is to be determined by the trial court rather than by the jury.

  4. Mahler v. Eby

    264 U.S. 32 (1924)   Cited 232 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government failed to comply "with all the statutory requirements"

  5. Am. Crystal Sugar Co. v. Mandeville Island Farms

    343 U.S. 957 (1952)   Cited 62 times
    Holding a limited publication "communicates the contents of a [work] to a definitely selected group and for a limited purpose,. . . ."

  6. Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy

    338 U.S. 521 (1950)   Cited 29 times
    In United States ex rel. Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 521, 70 S.Ct. 329, 94 L.Ed. 307 (1950), the Supreme Court was confronted with a case involving naturalized citizens, whose citizenship was later revoked and cancelled ab initio for fraud in the procurement.

  7. In re Pontarelli

    65 N.E.2d 83 (Ill. 1946)   Cited 10 times

    No. 29271. Respondent disbarred. Opinion filed March 20, 1946 PROCEEDING to disbar. CHARLES LEVITON, of Chicago, amicus curiae. JOHN J. MOSER, and GEORGE A. BOSOMBURG, both of Chicago, for respondent. Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the court: On May 12, 1943, an indictment was returned in the United States District Court for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois against George Ferdinand Pontarelli, charging him with violating the provisions of the Selective

  8. United States v. Hufford

    103 F. Supp. 859 (M.D. Pa. 1952)   Cited 3 times

    Cr. No. 12241. April 14, 1952. Arthur A. Maguire, Scranton, Pa., U.S. Atty., for plaintiff. Walter L. Hill, Jr., of O'Malley, Harris, Harris Warren, Scranton, Pa., J. Marlin Shreiner, Lancaster, Pa., for defendant. WATSON, Chief Judge. This case is now before the Court on a motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal. The defendant, Richard Allen Hufford, was indicted for violation of the "Universal Military Training and Service Act", 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, §§ 451-470 and the regulations issued