§

In the Matter of Pitzoff

10 I&N Dec. 35 (B.I.A. 1962)
In the Matter of Pitzoff

8 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Shaughnessy

    221 F.2d 578 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 21 times
    In United States ex rel. Zacharias v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 221 F.2d 578, it was held that in a deportation proceeding which began with a warrant of arrest served after 1952, eligibility for voluntary departure should be determined under the prior law, since the application for voluntary departure related back to an application for an immigrant visa filed by petitioner's wife some three months before the effective date of the 1952 Act.

  2. Dickhoff v. Shaughnessy

    142 F. Supp. 535 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)   Cited 15 times

    May 24, 1956. Blanch Freedman and Gloria Agrin, New York City, for plaintiff. Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., Southern Dist. of New York, New York City, Burton S. Sherman, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, Harold J. Raby, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, Roy Babitt, Attorney, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, of counsel, for defendant. DIMOCK, District Judge. Plaintiff, an alien resident, brings this action to set aside an order of deportation against him. He seeks an injunction

  3. Petitions of F---- G---- and E---- E---- G----

    137 F. Supp. 782 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)   Cited 14 times

    January 24, 1956. Arthur S. Schapira, New York City, for petitioners. William J. Kenville, New York City, Naturalization Examiner. DAWSON, District Judge. These contested petitions for naturalization raise the question whether adultery committed by petitioners before the effective date of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et seq. but within the five-year period preceding the filing of the petitions for naturalization constitute per se a bar to naturalization because of

  4. Evans v. Murff

    135 F. Supp. 907 (D. Md. 1955)   Cited 6 times

    Civ. No. 7826. November 29, 1955. Harold Buchman, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff. George Cochran Doub, U.S. Atty., and James H. Langrall, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md. (Abraham Scharf, Acting District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, on brief), for defendant. THOMSEN, Chief Judge. This proceeding to review a deportation order and the denial by the Attorney General of discretionary relief raises the following questions: whether the provisions of the Administrative

  5. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,720 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  6. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  7. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,132 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility

  8. Section 103.5 - Reopening or reconsideration

    8 C.F.R. § 103.5   Cited 215 times
    Authorizing officers to exercise their discretion to excuse untimely filing of motion to reopen or reconsider where movant demonstrates that delay was reasonable and beyond the movant's control