§
In the Matter of Mesa

5 Cited authorities

  1. Boston Sand Co. v. United States

    278 U.S. 41 (1928)   Cited 177 times
    Finding plain meaning rule an axiom of experience rather than a rule of law

  2. Barrett v. Van Pelt

    268 U.S. 85 (1925)   Cited 75 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that loss not shown with regard to late delivery of a shipment of eggs where plaintiff did not establish date when eggs should have been delivered and market price on that date

  3. Van Camp Sons v. Am. Can Co.

    278 U.S. 245 (1929)   Cited 64 times
    Rejecting construction that section 2 only protected primary line competition between the discriminator and its competitors

  4. Danciger v. Cooley

    248 U.S. 319 (1919)   Cited 33 times
    In Danciger v. Conley (248 U.S. 319, 326) the court in discussing the rule, among other things, said: "Its proper office is to give effect to the true intention of that body, not to defeat it."

  5. Section 103.4 - Certifications

    8 C.F.R. § 103.4   Cited 8 times
    Stating that unpublished Board decisions are not binding on the agency