In the Matter of M____ D____ S

4 Cited authorities

  1. Karnuth v. United States

    279 U.S. 231 (1929)   Cited 64 times
    In Karnuth, supra, the Supreme Court drew a distinction between vested property rights and mere privileges in the context of Article III of the Jay Treaty and employed a rationale different from McCandless. Karnuth involved two Canadian residents (not Indians) who were denied entry into the United States because they had been classified as quota immigrants rather than tourists.
  2. Petition of Correa

    79 F. Supp. 265 (W.D. Tex. 1948)   Cited 4 times

    No. 7669. August 11, 1948. George Rodriguez, of El Paso, for petitioner. Brooks Thomas, of El Paso, for the government. Proceeding in the matter of the petition for naturalization of Manuel Correa, wherein the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service contested the petition. Petition denied. THOMASON, District Judge. This case involves the petition of Manuel Correa for admission to citizenship of the United States. He has met all the requirements of the law necessary to citizenship except

  3. In re Barron

    26 F.2d 106 (E.D. Mich. 1928)   Cited 9 times

    May 9, 1928. Martin J. Kilsdonk, of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. O.T. Moore, District Director of Naturalization, and James L. Pangle, Asst. District Director of Naturalization, both of Detroit, Mich., opposed. Naturalization Proceedings. In the matter of the petition of Orion P. Barron for admission to citizenship of the United States. Petition denied without prejudice to his right to thereafter file a valid petition. TUTTLE, District Judge. The petitioner is a citizen of Great Britain. He was

  4. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,950 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"