§
In the Matter of M

4 Cited authorities

  1. Edwards v. California

    314 U.S. 160 (1941)   Cited 331 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding it unconstitutional for a state to prohibit bringing an "indigent," nonresident into the state

  2. Railroad Co. v. Husen

    95 U.S. 465 (1877)   Cited 203 times
    In Railroad Co. v. Husen, 95 U.S. 465, 473, this court said that "the police power of a State cannot obstruct foreign commerce or interstate commerce beyond the necessity for its exercise; and under color of it objects not within its scope cannot be secured at the expense of the protection afforded by the Federal Constitution."

  3. CHY LUNG v. FREEMAN ET AL

    92 U.S. 275 (1875)   Cited 101 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Observing that federal power would be necessary in part because "bordering States ... under the impulse of sudden irritation, and a quick sense of apparent interest or injury" might take action that would undermine foreign relations

  4. Weeks v. Mansfield

    80 A. 784 (Conn. 1911)   Cited 7 times
    In Weeks v. Mansfield, 84 Conn. 544, 80 A. 784, a gift to the Connecticut Hospital for the Insane, the income to be expended for the support of indigent insane persons, with a preference of such as belonged in the town of the testator's residence, was restricted, except in certain circumstances, to the support of such insane at the Connecticut Hospital.