In the Matter of L---- F---- F

28 Cited authorities

  1. Shanks v. State

    185 Md. 437 (Md. 1945)   Cited 44 times
    In Shanks v. State, 185 Md. 437, 45 A.2d 85 (1945), evidence that the blood type of a rape victim was the same as that of stains on the defendant's coat, viz., Type O, was admitted by the trial court, in spite of testimony that 45 percent of the population has Type O blood.
  2. State, ex Rel. v. Clark

    144 Ohio St. 305 (Ohio 1944)   Cited 39 times

    No. 30033 Decided December 27, 1944. Bastardy — Unmarried and pregnant woman may institute proceedings — Although child conceived during existence of lawful marriage — Section 12110, General Code — Child presumed legitimate, when — Presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence, when — Blood-grouping test — Expert may testify that findings and result of test excluded paternity — Such testimony not conclusive as to nonpaternity — Plaintiff to prove nonpaternity of former husband by clear

  3. Jordan v. Mace

    144 Me. 351 (Me. 1949)   Cited 25 times
    In Jordan v. Mace, 69 A.2d 670 (1940), the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, recognizing the worth of the tests, held that where exclusion of parentage was shown by competently given tests, the evidence was conclusive.
  4. Ly Shew v. Acheson

    110 F. Supp. 50 (N.D. Cal. 1953)   Cited 18 times
    In Ly Shew v. Acheson, D.C., 110 F. Supp. 50, the trial court held that the burden upon such a claimant was heavier than the regular burden.
  5. Commissioner of Welfare of N.Y. v. Costonie

    277 AD 90 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)   Cited 17 times
    In Commissioner of Welfare of City of N.Y. v Costonie (277 App. Div. 90), the Appellate Division reversed a finding of paternity, and remanded for a new trial based on the failure of the trial court to give conclusive weight to the results of a BGT which excluded paternity.
  6. Clark v. Rysedorph

    281 AD 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)   Cited 14 times
    In Clark v. Rysedorph (281 App. Div. 121), the Third Department, in December, 1952, dealt with this subject in a paternity proceeding.
  7. State v. Damm

    62 S.D. 123 (S.D. 1933)   Cited 36 times
    Applying the abuse of discretion standard during the review of a trial courts decision to clear spectators from the courtroom during the testimony of a 13-year-old victim of second degree rape
  8. Saks v. Saks

    189 Misc. 667 (N.Y. Dom. Rel. Ct. 1947)   Cited 19 times

    July 18, 1947. Herman Brothers for petitioner. Edward V. Whiting for respondent. PANKEN, J. The problem presented in this proceeding is the determination of the paternity of the child, Karl Bernard. The testimony reveals that the parties were married on or about February 21, 1943. The child, Karl Bernard, was born to the petitioner on or about May 6, 1943, some ten or eleven weeks after the marriage ceremony. A child born in wedlock, whether it was conceived before or after the marriage ceremony

  9. Williams v. State

    143 Fla. 826 (Fla. 1940)   Cited 25 times
    Holding blood type evidence admissible because “[a]ny evidence tending to identify defendant as the guilty person, and show his presence at the scene of the crime, is relevant and competent”
  10. Kwartler v. Kwartler

    291 N.Y. 689 (N.Y. 1943)   Cited 20 times
    In Kwartler v. Kwartler (291 N.Y. 689) the court certified an answer that the Supreme Court has the power to direct a blood-grouping test under section 306-a of the Civil Practice Act.
  11. Rule 35 - Physical and Mental Examinations

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 35   Cited 2,472 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Providing no cost-shifting mechanisms