In the Matter of Isovic

3 Cited authorities

  1. Hess v. Esperdy

    234 F. Supp. 909 (S.D.N.Y. 1964)   Cited 4 times

    September 21, 1964. Seth H. Dubin, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs. Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., by James G. Greilsheimer, Asst. U.S. Atty., for defendant. TYLER, District Judge. Plaintiffs bring this action under the Declaratory Judgment Act ( 28 U.S.C. § 2201) and Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 1009) seeking review of defendant's denial of plaintiff Hess' petition to classify plaintiff Morimoto as a temporary worker under § 101(a) (15) (H) (ii) of the Immigration

  2. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,720 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  3. Section 103.4 - Certifications

    8 C.F.R. § 103.4   Cited 8 times
    Stating that unpublished Board decisions are not binding on the agency