In the Matter of Hosseinian

13 Cited authorities

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services

    467 U.S. 51 (1984)   Cited 1,289 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Medicare provider was responsible for familiarizing itself with the legal requirements of cost reimbursement and obtaining an agency interpretation of the applicable regulations
  2. INS v. Miranda

    459 U.S. 14 (1982)   Cited 253 times
    Holding that negligent conduct is an insufficient basis for an estoppel claim against the government
  3. Loughran v. Loughran

    292 U.S. 216 (1934)   Cited 143 times
    Holding that Full Faith and Credit clause binds "courts of the District . . . equally with courts of the States"
  4. Mukherjee v. I.N.S.

    793 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 84 times
    Holding that the doctrine of equitable estoppel cannot be invoked where petitioner is injured by the INS's negligence and inadequate service because "[p]ersons dealing with the government are charged with knowing government statutes and regulations"
  5. Maynard v. Hill

    125 U.S. 190 (1888)   Cited 344 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding marriage to be "most important relation in life"
  6. Adams v. Howerton

    673 F.2d 1036 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 69 times
    Holding federal statute limited marriage to one man and one woman and did not violate federal constitution
  7. United States v. Sacco

    428 F.2d 264 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 31 times
    Construing 8 U.S.C. § 1302, 1306, 1451, (e)
  8. United States v. Seay

    718 F.2d 1279 (4th Cir. 1983)   Cited 7 times
    In Seay, the defendant was convicted of violating § 1001 by falsely stating to the Department of Labor that she had not remarried since her husband's death, when in fact she had been in a common-law marriage for some time.
  9. Estate of Atherley

    44 Cal.App.3d 758 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 15 times

    Docket No. 13633. January 21, 1975. Appeal from Superior Court of Riverside County, No. 28718, Leo A. Deegan, Judge. COUNSEL Rager, Rager, Winstead Bright and Henry F. Rager for Petitioner and Appellant. Sullivan Brown, William H. Sullivan and John Adler for Objector and Respondent. OPINION KAUFMAN, J. Annette Atherley (hereafter "Annette") appeals from determination of heirship in the estate of Harold Atherley (hereafter "Harold"). Harold died intestate September 2, 1969. Annette and Ruth Atherley

  10. Lee v. C. I. R

    550 F.2d 1201 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 76-1191, 76-1192. March 29, 1977. Charles A. Lane, Schwartz Lane, San Francisco, Cal., on brief, for appellants. Meade Whitaker, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Washington, D.C., Scott Crampton, Gilbert E. Andrews, Elmer J. Kelsey, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, for appellee. On Appeal from the Decisions of the United States Tax Court. Before CHOY and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, District Judge. The Honorable David W. Williams, United States District Judge for the Central

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,912 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  12. Section 1151 - Worldwide level of immigration

    8 U.S.C. § 1151   Cited 884 times
    Defining "immediate relatives"
  13. Section 204.2 - Petitions for relatives, widows and widowers, and abused spouses and children

    8 C.F.R. § 204.2   Cited 440 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Conferring priority date retention on a derivative beneficiary only "if the subsequent petition is filed by the same petitioner"