§

In the Matter of H---- H---- and H---- M

3 I&N Dec. 680 (B.I.A. 1950)
In the Matter of H---- H---- and H---- M

5 Cited authorities

  1. Ng Fung Ho v. White

    259 U.S. 276 (1922)   Cited 374 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Permitting habeas corpus review of deportation orders

  2. Warszower v. United States

    312 U.S. 342 (1941)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that "[a]n uncorroborated confession . . . does not as a matter of law establish beyond a reasonable doubt the commission of a crime"

  3. Tang Tun v. Edsell

    223 U.S. 673 (1912)   Cited 103 times
    In Tang Tun v. Edsell, 223 U.S. 673, 681, 32 S. Ct. 359, 363 (56 L. Ed. 606), it was held that the Secretary might at all times take cognizance of the records of the official files, "and," said the court, "it would be extraordinary indeed to impute bad faith or improper conduct to the executive officers, because they examined the records or acquainted themselves with former official action."

  4. LEE FONG FOOK v. WIXON

    170 F.2d 245 (9th Cir. 1948)   Cited 12 times

    No. 11860. October 25, 1948. As Amended November 8, 1948. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Louis E. Goodman, Judge. Habeas corpus proceeding by Lee Fong Fook against I.F. Wixon, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Port of San Francisco, to procure release from detention as an alien immigrant without a visa. From an order denying the petition, 74 F. Supp. 68, petitioner appeals. Remanded with directions

  5. Ex Parte Delaney

    72 F. Supp. 312 (S.D. Cal. 1947)   Cited 5 times

    No. 4591. February 21, 1947. In the matter of the application of John Delaney for a writ of habeas corpus. Writ granted, and petitioner ordered released from technical custody and his bond ordered exonerated. David C. Marcus, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. James M. Carter, U.S. Atty., Robert Wright, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Bruce G. Barber, Chief, Adjudications Div., U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. J. F. T. O'CONNOR, District Judge. John