§
In the Matter of Fueyo

9 Cited authorities

  1. Pena-Cabanillas v. United States

    394 F.2d 785 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 118 times
    Finding 8 U.S.C. § 1326, which criminalizes illegal reentry, was "not based on any common law crime"

  2. United States v. Hussein

    675 F.2d 114 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 24 times
    Affirming the conviction for entry without permission from the Attorney General after deportation

  3. United States v. Newton

    677 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that government need not show that defendant specifically intended to disobey the law in order to prove violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326

  4. Solis-Davila v. I.N.S.

    456 F.2d 424 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 7 times

    No. 71-2620. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N.Y., 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970). March 1, 1972. Albert Armendariz, Sr., El Paso, Tex., for petitioner. John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of U.S., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Troy A. Adams, Jr., District Director, I.N.S., New Orleans, La., William S. Sessions, U.S. Atty., Hugh P. Shoulin, Asst. U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for respondent. Petition for review from the Immigration and

  5. Section 1326 - Reentry of removed aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1326   Cited 31,685 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Defining offense elements

  6. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,905 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  7. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  8. Section 212.2 - Consent to reapply for admission after deportation, removal or departure at Government expense

    8 C.F.R. § 212.2   Cited 107 times
    Providing that Attorney General may consent to readmission twenty years after aggravated-felony removal

  9. Section 212.4 - Applications for the exercise of discretion under section 212(d)(1) and 212(d)(3)

    8 C.F.R. § 212.4   Cited 13 times

    (a)Applications under section 212(d)(3)(A) - (1)General. District directors and officers in charge outside the United States in the districts of Bangkok, Thailand; Mexico City, Mexico; and Rome, Italy are authorized to act upon recommendations made by consular officers for the exercise of discretion under section 212(d)(3)(A) of the Act. The District Director, Washington, DC, has jurisdiction in such cases recommended to the Service at the seat-of-government level by the Department of State. When