IN THE MATTER OF DE S
3 Cited authorities
Keck v. United States
172 U.S. 434 (1899) Cited 105 timesHolding that concealing imported goods on vessels "at the time of entering the waters of the United States," without more, did not constitute smuggling
United States v. Ritterman
273 U.S. 261 (1927) Cited 13 timesIn United States v. Ritterman, 273 U.S. 261, 47 S.Ct. 371, 71 L.Ed. 636 (1927), the defendant left Montreal, Canada, for New York, with diamonds hidden in his hand bag. He did not declare the diamonds to a United States Customs inspector in Montreal, nor did he declare them to the Customs inspector when he crossed the border from Canada into Vermont. Only when Customs agents began a personal search of the defendant did he inform the agents he had diamonds in his bag.
Ritterman v. United States
12 F.2d 849 (2d Cir. 1926) Cited 3 timesNo. 392. June 10, 1926. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Vermont. Leib Ritterman was convicted of smuggling, in violation of Tariff Act 1922, ยง 593, and he brings error. Reversed. Barnes, McKenna Halstead, of New York City (Albert MacC. Barnes, Jr., and James M. Snee, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error. Harry B. Amey, U.S. Atty., of Island Pond, Vt., and Allen Martin, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Essex Junction, Vt. Before ROGERS, MANTON, and