§
In the Matter of C

7 Cited authorities

  1. Carlson v. Landon

    342 U.S. 524 (1952)   Cited 635 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mandatory detention of Communist noncitizens in removal proceedings does not violate the Due Process Clause

  2. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 577 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"

  3. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 346 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."

  4. United States v. Smith

    289 U.S. 422 (1933)   Cited 85 times
    Counterfeiting ranks as a crime of moral turpitude

  5. Lapina v. Williams

    232 U.S. 78 (1914)   Cited 77 times
    In Lapina v. Williams it did appear that the alien had practiced prostitution for many years before her temporary departure from the country, and that she not only returned with the intent to continue the practice but did almost immediately engage in it, and continued it until her arrest under the provisions of the Immigration Act.

  6. Quon Quon Poy v. Johnson

    273 U.S. 352 (1927)   Cited 40 times

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 68. Argued December 9, 10, 1926. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. A hearing before a Board of Special Inquiry, in an immigration proceeding, was not rendered unfair by mere delay in its commencement; nor by the absence of a friend or relative of the applicant for entry, when the applicant waived his right in that regard; nor by the introduction before the Board of testimony previously taken by an inspector, where the

  7. Podolski v. Baird

    94 F. Supp. 294 (E.D. Mich. 1950)   Cited 4 times

    No. 9884. November 6, 1950. Isaac M. Smullin, Detroit, Mich., Englander Englander, New York City, for petitioner. Edward T. Kane, U.S. Atty., Joseph C. Murphy, Asst. U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., Harry Kobel, District Adjudications Officer, Immigration Naturalization Service, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. KOSCINSKI, District Judge. Findings of Fact 1. Petitioner, Henry Podolski, seeks by writ of habeas corpus to obtain his release from custody for the reason that he is being illegally deprived of