In the Matter of C

12 Cited authorities

Berman v. United States
302 U.S. 211 (1937) Cited 626 times
Holding that the final judgment in a criminal case is the sentence
Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Murphy
231 Ala. 680 (Ala. 1936) Cited 45 times
In Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. Murphy, 231 Ala. 680, 166 So. 604, on rehearing, it is clearly held that conviction in a federal court in this state of perjury would render a witness incompetent in our state courts.
People v. Fabian
192 N.Y. 443 (N.Y. 1908) Cited 82 times
In Fabian, WILLARD BARTLETT, J., traced the history of the constitutional and statutory provisions involved and determined that the framers of the 1822 Constitution intended to disfranchise someone by no less a "conviction" than that necessary to disqualify him as a witness.
In re Smith
5 N.E.2d 227 (Ill. 1936) Cited 23 times
No. 23238. Respondent censured. Opinion filed December 10, 1936. PROCEEDING to disbar. WILLIAM D. KNIGHT, amicus curiæ. ASA J. WILBOURN, and EVERETT LEWIS, for respondent. Mr. JUSTICE ORR delivered the opinion of the court: The Pulaski County Bar Association filed a complaint against respondent, J. Kelly Smith, a practicing lawyer of this State, charging him with misconduct and unethical practice. Evidence was heard by the grievance committee of the Illinois State Bar Association for the First Supreme
In re Ringnalda
48 F. Supp. 975 (S.D. Cal. 1943) Cited 13 times
Petition No. 102844. February 19, 1943. Albert Del Guercio, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Louis G. Tellner, Examiner, of Los Angeles, Cal., for the government. Proceeding in the matter of the petition of Wijbe Ringnalda to be admitted as a citizen of the United States of America, wherein the District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, filed an objection to the granting of the petition. Objection of the District Director, Immigration
Teslovich et Ux. v. Fire. F. Ins. Co.
110 Pa. Super. 245 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1933) Cited 18 times
In Teslovich, this Court concluded a plea of nolo contendere was not admissible in a civil action upon a fire policy loss resulting from the fire for which the insured was prosecuted.
Schad v. McNinch
103 W. Va. 44 (W. Va. 1927) Cited 20 times
No. 5693 Submitted January 18, 1927. Decided January 25, 1927. Error to Circuit Court, Marshall County. Habeas corpus by F.L. Schad against F.A. McNinch, Sheriff of Marshall County. Order dismissing the writ and sustaining a motion to quash it, and petitioner brings error. Affirmed. Everett F. Moore, for plaintiff in error. WOODS, JUDGE: This writ of error is prosecuted from a judgment of the circuit court of Marshall county in dismissing the writ of habeas corpus on the hearing thereof. F. L. Schad
U.S. v. Weirton Steel Co.
62 F. Supp. 961 (N.D.W. Va. 1945) Cited 2 times
Nos. A-5634, A-5635. November 14, 1945. Joe V. Gibson, U.S. Atty., of Kingwood, W. Va., E.E. Hamstead, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Morgantown, W.Va., Theron L. Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Gordon L. Eakle, Sp. Atty., of Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Earl L. Maxwell, of Elkins, W. Va., and Earl F. Reed and John E. Laughlin, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant. BAKER, District Judge. To each of the above indictments the defendant has entered a plea of nolo contendere. The first case, No. A-5634, contains
State v. LaRose
52 A. 943 (N.H. 1902) Cited 39 times
In State v. La Rose, 71 N.H. 435, 52 A. 943, the plea is thus characterized: `The plea is in the nature of a compromise between the state and the defendant, — a matter not of right, but of favor.
Olszewski v. Goldberg
223 Mass. 27 (Mass. 1916) Cited 11 times
In Olszewski v. Goldberg, 111 N.E. 404 (Mass. 1916), the court restated the now familiar proposition that a nolo plea "admits, for the purposes of the case, all the facts which are well stated, but it is not to be used as an admission elsewhere."

In the Matter of C

12 Cited authorities

Holding that the final judgment in a criminal case is the sentence

In Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. Murphy, 231 Ala. 680, 166 So. 604, on rehearing, it is clearly held that conviction in a federal court in this state of perjury would render a witness incompetent in our state courts.

In Fabian, WILLARD BARTLETT, J., traced the history of the constitutional and statutory provisions involved and determined that the framers of the 1822 Constitution intended to disfranchise someone by no less a "conviction" than that necessary to disqualify him as a witness.

In Teslovich, this Court concluded a plea of nolo contendere was not admissible in a civil action upon a fire policy loss resulting from the fire for which the insured was prosecuted.

In State v. La Rose, 71 N.H. 435, 52 A. 943, the plea is thus characterized: `The plea is in the nature of a compromise between the state and the defendant, — a matter not of right, but of favor.

In Olszewski v. Goldberg, 111 N.E. 404 (Mass. 1916), the court restated the now familiar proposition that a nolo plea "admits, for the purposes of the case, all the facts which are well stated, but it is not to be used as an admission elsewhere."