§
In the Matter of C

10 Cited authorities

  1. Vajtauer v. Comm'r of Immigration

    273 U.S. 103 (1927)   Cited 436 times
    Holding that deportation "on charges unsupported by any evidence is a denial of due process which may be corrected on habeas corpus"

  2. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 346 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."

  3. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  4. United States v. Smith

    289 U.S. 422 (1933)   Cited 85 times
    Counterfeiting ranks as a crime of moral turpitude

  5. United States v. Local 807

    315 U.S. 521 (1942)   Cited 54 times
    In Teamsters, this Court construed an exception provided in the Anti-Racketeering Act for the payment of wages by a bona fide employer to a bona fide employee to find that the Act "did not cover the actions of union truckdrivers who exacted money by threats or violence from out-of-town drivers in return for undesired and often unutilized services."

  6. United States v. Karmuth

    1 F. Supp. 370 (N.D.N.Y. 1932)   Cited 10 times

    September 1, 1932. Morris I. Lipsitz, of Buffalo, N.Y., for relator. Oliver D. Burden, U.S. Atty., of Syracuse, N.Y., for respondent. COOPER, District Judge. This is a habeas corpus proceeding on behalf of the relator, Paul Valenti, held under warrant of deportation. The relator was born in Italy December 15, 1908, and came to this country with his parents October 28, 1914, and has ever since resided with them at Buffalo, attending school in that city, at least until June 16, 1924. It is asserted

  7. Stebbins v. Duncan

    108 U.S. 32 (1882)   Cited 20 times

    IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. OCTOBER TERM, 1882. Deed — Evidence — Record of Deeds. 1. Suggestion of the death of a plaintiff in the record, and an order to make his devisees parties, is prima facie evidence of his death for the purposes of the trial. 2. The existence of a deed, and its destruction by fire being proven, it is competent for the party offering it to prove its contents by a witness who knows them. 3. It being shown that a

  8. United States v. Marshall

    4 F. Supp. 965 (W.D. Pa. 1933)   Cited 2 times

    No. 72. April 7, 1933. Jacob Seligsohn and William D. Grimes, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for Franjo Borich. Louis E. Graham, U.S. Atty., and Lloyd W. Bryan, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. GIBSON, District Judge. The relator, Franjo Borich, was held by William H. Marshall, district director of immigration, upon a departmental warrant ordering his deportation. Pursuant to his petition a writ of habeas corpus issued upon the district director, who has filed his return, wherein

  9. Section 1951 - Interference with commerce by threats or violence

    18 U.S.C. § 1951   Cited 12,031 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Defining extortion in ACCA as “the obtaining of something of value from another, with his consent, induced by the wrongful use or threatened use of force against the person or property of another ”

  10. Section 1732 - Record made in regular course of business; photographic copies

    28 U.S.C. § 1732   Cited 754 times
    Governing admission of business records into evidence