§
In the Matter of A.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Commonwealth v. Martin

    304 Mass. 320 (Mass. 1939)   Cited 26 times
    In Commonwealth v. Martin, 304 Mass. 320, 322, it was held that when a statute "disjunctively prescribes several acts in a series of acts, all of which are alleged in the complaint, then the Commonwealth may prove the violation of the statute by proof of the performance by the defendant of any one of the said acts."

  2. Pollard v. Lyon

    91 U.S. 225 (1875)   Cited 67 times
    In Pollard v. Lyon, 91 U.S. 225, also relied on by appellant, the cases on the point as to the necessity for alleging special damages were fully presented, and it was held that where the words are not actionable in themselves, not charging an indictable offense, there must be a statement of the special loss or injury or the declaration is bad, although the language used imputes moral turpitude.

  3. Chase v. Proprietors of Revere House

    232 Mass. 88 (Mass. 1919)   Cited 44 times
    In Chase v. Proprietors of the Revere House, 232 Mass. 88 (1919), the court gave unanimous approval to the statute against a challenge founded on art. 12 of our Declaration of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

  4. United States ex rel. Tourny v. Reimer

    8 F. Supp. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)

    8 F.Supp. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1934) UNITED STATES ex rel. TOURNY v. REIMER, Com'r of Immigration, etc. United States District Court, S.D. New York Aug. 23, 1934 Joshua S. Koenigsberg, of New York City, for relator. Martin Conboy, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Edward J. Ennis, Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for respondent. CAFFEY, District Judge. Subdivision (e) of section 3 of the Immigration Act of 1917 (8 USCA § 136(e)), requires exclusion from admission into the United States of aliens