§
In the Matter of A.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Karnuth v. United States

    279 U.S. 231 (1929)   Cited 64 times
    In Karnuth, supra, the Supreme Court drew a distinction between vested property rights and mere privileges in the context of Article III of the Jay Treaty and employed a rationale different from McCandless. Karnuth involved two Canadian residents (not Indians) who were denied entry into the United States because they had been classified as quota immigrants rather than tourists.

  2. McCandless v. United States

    25 F.2d 71 (3d Cir. 1928)   Cited 11 times

    No. 3672. March 9, 1928. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Oliver B. Dickinson, Judge. Habeas corpus by the United States, on the relation of Paul Diabo, against John B. McCandless, Commissioner of Immigration for the Port of Philadelphia. Order granting the writ (18 F.[2d] 282) and respondent appeals. Affirmed. George W. Coles, U.S. Atty., and Robert M. Anderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant. Adrian Bonnelly