Submitted February term, 1934. Decided May 4th, 1934. 1. It is fundamental that the intention and policy of congress us expressed in the National Industrial Recovery act, should be effectuated, and that the act should receive a sensible construction and not one leading to injustice, oppression or an absurd consequence. There is no expression in the Recovery act of a congressional purpose to deprive employes of the right to strike where, as here, their demands for a wage increase are not complied
June 20, 1951. Kirlin, Campbell Keating, New York City, Delbert M. Tibbetts, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff. Irving H. Saypol, U.S. Atty., New York City, John M. Cunneen, New York City, of counsel, for defendant. SUGARMAN, District Judge. The plaintiff United States Lines Company commenced this action against W.F. Watkins, Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service of New York, for a declaratory judgment, an injunction, and money damages. Subsequently, by stipulation entered into