In re Sanchez-Lopez

38 Cited authorities

  1. Mathis v. United States

    136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016)   Cited 4,441 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court employing the categorical approach "looks to a limited class of documents"
  2. Descamps v. United States

    570 U.S. 254 (2013)   Cited 5,043 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "may look only to the statutory definitions—i.e ., the elements—of a defendant’s prior offenses"
  3. Taylor v. United States

    495 U.S. 575 (1990)   Cited 5,292 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "burglary" as used in the Armed Career Criminal Act was to be given its "generic, contemporary meaning" to avoid a scenario in which "a person ... would, or would not, receive a sentence enhancement based on exactly the same conduct, depending on whether the State of his prior conviction happened to call that conduct ‘burglary’ "
  4. Moncrieffe v. Holder

    569 U.S. 184 (2013)   Cited 1,380 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sharing marijuana not an aggravated felony
  5. Voisine v. United States

    136 S. Ct. 2272 (2016)   Cited 292 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "use of force," standing alone, encompasses crimes committed with ordinary recklessness
  6. Torres v. Lynch

    578 U.S. 452 (2016)   Cited 153 times
    Holding an aggravated felony conviction renders an alien ineligible for cancellation of removal
  7. U.S. v. Grisel

    488 F.3d 844 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 237 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where "a state statute explicitly defines a crime more broadly than the generic definition, no ‘legal imagination,’ is required to hold that a realistic probability exists that the state will apply its statute to conduct that falls outside the generic definition of the crime" (citing Duenas-Alvarez , 549 U.S. at 193, 127 S.Ct. 815 )
  8. U.S. v. Oca

    655 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 160 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Addressing when modified categorical approach applies
  9. Almanza-Arenas v. Lynch

    815 F.3d 469 (9th Cir. 2015)   Cited 126 times
    Holding that we "need not go beyond California's pattern criminal jury instructions" to resolve divisibility
  10. Young v. Holder

    697 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 112 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the cancellation of removal context that “an inconclusive record ... is insufficient to satisfy the alien's burden of proof”
  11. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,048 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  12. Section 646.9 - [Effective 1/1/2025] Stalking

    Cal. Pen. Code § 646.9   Cited 1,153 times
    Stalking statute
  13. Section 2903.211 - Menacing by stalking

    Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.211   Cited 758 times
    Menacing by stalking
  14. Section 2261A - Stalking

    18 U.S.C. § 2261A   Cited 639 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing interstate travel or use of interstate commerce "with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate."
  15. Section 750.411h - Stalking; definitions; violation as misdemeanor; penalties; probation; conditions; evidence of continued conduct as rebuttable presumption; additional penalties

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.411h   Cited 166 times
    Defining stalking as "a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another individual that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested."
  16. Section 9A.46.110 - Stalking

    Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.46.110   Cited 131 times
    Defining misdemeanor stalking
  17. Section 784.048 - Stalking; definitions; penalties

    Fla. Stat. § 784.048   Cited 95 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting repeated acts of following or communicating
  18. Section 18-9-111 - Harassment - Kiana Arellano's Law

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-111   Cited 85 times

    (1) A person commits harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another person, he or she: (a) Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise touches a person or subjects him to physical contact; or (b) In a public place directs obscene language or makes an obscene gesture to or at another person; or (c) Follows a person in or about a public place; or (d) Repealed. (e) Directly or indirectly initiates communication with a person or directs language toward another person, anonymously or otherwise

  19. Section 35-45-10-2 - "Harassment" defined

    Ind. Code § 35-45-10-2   Cited 45 times
    Defining harassment as "conduct directed toward a victim that includes but is not limited to repeated or continuing impermissible contact that would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress and that actually causes the victim to suffer emotional distress."