§
In re Rodriguez

16 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,290 times   628 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

    519 U.S. 337 (1997)   Cited 2,547 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII

  3. Camreta v. Greene

    563 U.S. 692 (2011)   Cited 1,196 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, when "a civil suit becomes moot pending appeal," we may "vacate the judgment below" so "no party is harmed by what we have called a preliminary adjudication"

  4. HiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp.

    938 F.3d 985 (9th Cir. 2019)   Cited 90 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Finding irreparable harm where company showed likelihood of having to breach existing contracts with specific clients, that its financing round had been stalled, and that several employees had left the company

  5. Serrano v. U.S. Attorney General

    655 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2011)   Cited 66 times
    Finding district court properly dismissed request for mandamus relief where APA provided adequate remedy

  6. U.S. v. Orellana

    405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005)   Cited 60 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an alien is "illegally or unlawfully in the United States" for purposes of § 922(g) if his presence is "forbidden or not authorized by law"

  7. Flores v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.

    718 F.3d 548 (6th Cir. 2013)   Cited 38 times
    Applying Skidmore deference to BIA's interpretation of a non-immigration statute

  8. Ramirez v. Brown

    852 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2017)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that, because a TPS recipient must be treated as a nonimmigrant for adjustment purposes, she is deemed to have met all requirements for nonimmigrant status, including inspection and admission

  9. Melendez v. McAleenan

    928 F.3d 425 (5th Cir. 2019)   Cited 21 times
    In Melendez, a TPS beneficiary without an outstanding removal order applied for adjustment of status, and USCIS denied his application, determining that he was not eligible for adjustment due to a previous period of unlawful presence in the country.

  10. Sanchez v. Sec'y U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

    967 F.3d 242 (3d Cir. 2020)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that such a person cannot do so

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,863 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,994 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,921 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists

  14. Section 1254a - Temporary protected status

    8 U.S.C. § 1254a   Cited 248 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Granting the right to live and work in the United States to citizens of designated countries afflicted by war, natural disaster, or extraordinary and temporary conditions