§
In re Morales-Morales

14 Cited authorities

  1. Holland v. Florida

    560 U.S. 631 (2010)   Cited 14,682 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 2254 does not preclude equitable tolling of a statute of limitations based on attorney misconduct in habeas proceedings

  2. Bowles v. Russell

    551 U.S. 205 (2007)   Cited 3,628 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "unique circumstances" doctrine may not excuse untimely filing of appeal in civil case

  3. Henderson v. Shinseki

    562 U.S. 428 (2011)   Cited 1,644 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there must be "clear indication that Congress wanted the rule to be jurisdictional," although Congress "need not use magic words" (cleaned up)

  4. Kontrick v. Ryan

    540 U.S. 443 (2004)   Cited 1,711 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that time limit for objection in bankruptcy proceedings is not jurisdictional but instead a claim-processing rule

  5. Stone v. INS

    514 U.S. 386 (1995)   Cited 1,096 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the IJ's removal order and the Board's denial of a motion to reopen are “two separate final orders”

  6. United States v. Locke

    471 U.S. 84 (1985)   Cited 685 times
    Holding that the plaintiffs’ actual intent was irrelevant to whether they satisfied a federal mining statute’s requirement to file a notice of intent to hold a mining claim by a certain date

  7. Schacht v. United States

    398 U.S. 58 (1970)   Cited 185 times
    Holding that Court may waive compliance with “procedural rules adopted by the Court for the orderly transaction of its business,” which are “not jurisdictional”

  8. Irigoyen-Briones v. Holder

    644 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that the 30–day deadline to file a notice of appeal with the BIA was not jurisdictional

  9. Attipoe v. Barr

    945 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2019)   Cited 4 times

    Docket No. 18-204 August Term, 2018 12-19-2019 Emeli Kwasi ATTIPOE, aka Emeli Attipoe, aka Andrew C. Mitchell, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, United States Attorney General, Respondent. MATTHEW J. MOFFA, Perkins Coie LLP (Gene W. Lee, on the brief), New York, NY, for Petitioner Emeli Kwasi Attipoe. BRETT F. KINNEY, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation (Joseph J. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Kohsei Ugumori, Senior Litigation Counsel, on the brief), Washington

  10. Boch-Saban v. Garland

    30 F.4th 411 (5th Cir. 2022)   Cited 1 times

    No. 20-60540 04-08-2022 Jose Santos BOCH-SABAN, Petitioner, v. Merrick GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. Stacy Tolchin, Law Offices of Stacy Tolchin, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner. Jennifer A. Singer, Carmel Morgan, Esq., Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. Stacy Tolchin, Law Offices of Stacy Tolchin, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner. Jennifer A. Singer, Carmel Morgan, Esq., Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent

  11. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,448 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  12. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,726 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  13. Section 1003.38 - Appeals

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.38   Cited 35 times
    Providing rules for appeals

  14. Section 1003.8 - Fees before the Board

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.8   Cited 4 times

    (a)Appeals and motions before the Board - (1)When a fee is required. Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section and 8 CFR 1208.4(d)(3) , a filing fee prescribed in 8 CFR 1103.7 , or a fee waiver request pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, is required in connection with the filing of an appeal, a motion to reopen, or a motion to reconsider before the Board. (2)When a fee is not required. A filing fee is not required in the following instances: (i) A custody bond appeal filed