§
In re Miguel Gadda

11 Cited authorities

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch

    488 U.S. 299 (1989)   Cited 201 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state scheme of utility regulation disallowing recovery of capital investments is not a taking of property

  2. Noriega-Lopez v. Ashcroft

    335 F.3d 874 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 187 times
    Holding that where the BIA lacks authority to enter a removal order, the removal order is "a legal nullity"

  3. Certiorari Denied

    539 U.S. 943 (2003)   Cited 8 times

    JUNE 23, 2003. No. 02-1551. GAYMAN v. PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 311 F.3d 851. No. 02-1554. GADDA v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. No. 02-1560. VENGADASALAM v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 48 Fed. Appx. 327. No. 02-1571. DWIGHT v. CROSBY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 49 Fed. Appx. 288

  4. Gadda v. State Bar

    50 Cal.3d 344 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 6 times
    In Gadda v. State Bar (1990) 50 Cal.3d 344 [ 267 Cal.Rptr. 114, 787 P.2d 95], among other acts of misconduct, the attorney mailed between 500 and 800 letters advertising his ability to provide legal advice about a new federal immigration law.

  5. Waters v. Barr

    747 P.2d 900 (Nev. 1987)   Cited 5 times

    No. 17384 December 31, 1987 Kermitt L. Waters, in Proper Person. Michael E. Barr, former Bar Counsel, Las Vegas, and Ann Bersi, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada, Reno, for Respondents. OPINION Per Curiam: This petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the refusal of a former counsel for the State Bar of Nevada to investigate a private complaint against two Assistant United States Attorneys. One of these attorneys is a member of the State Bar of Nevada; the other is not. We note that shortly

  6. Section 1257 - State courts; certiorari

    28 U.S.C. § 1257   Cited 3,701 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a final judgment rendered by the highest state court may only be reviewed by the United States Supreme Court

  7. Section 1292.1 - Representation of others

    8 C.F.R. § 1292.1   Cited 28 times
    Regarding admission to practice in the immigration courts

  8. Section 1003.103 - Immediate suspension and summary disciplinary proceedings; duty of practitioner to notify EOIR of conviction or discipline

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.103   Cited 8 times

    (a)Immediate Suspension - (1)Petition. The EOIR disciplinary counsel shall file a petition with the Board to suspend immediately from practice before the Board and the Immigration Courts any practitioner who has been found guilty of, or pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to, a serious crime, as defined in § 1003.102(h) , or any practitioner who has been suspended or disbarred by, or while a disciplinary investigation or proceeding is pending has resigned from, the highest court of any State, possession

  9. Section 1003.105 - Notice of Intent to Discipline

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.105   Cited 3 times

    (a)Issuance of Notice. (1) If, upon completion of the preliminary inquiry, the EOIR disciplinary counsel determines that sufficient prima facie evidence exists to warrant charging a practitioner with professional misconduct as set forth in § 1003.102 or a recognized organization with misconduct as set forth in § 1003.110 , the EOIR disciplinary counsel will file with the Board and issue to the practitioner or organization that was the subject of the preliminary inquiry a Notice of Intent to Discipline

  10. Section 1003.107 - Reinstatement after disbarment or suspension

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.107   Cited 2 times

    (a)Reinstatement upon expiration of suspension. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, after the period of suspension has expired, a practitioner who has been suspended and wishes to be reinstated must file a motion to the Board requesting reinstatement to practice before the Board and the Immigration Courts, or DHS, or before all three authorities. The practitioner must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that notwithstanding the suspension, the practitioner otherwise

  11. Section 1003.106 - Right to be heard and disposition

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.106

    (a)Right to be heard - (1)Summary disciplinary proceedings. A practitioner who is subject to summary disciplinary proceedings pursuant to § 1003.103(b) must make a prima facie showing to the Board in his or her answer that there is a material issue of fact in dispute with regard to the basis for summary disciplinary proceedings, or with one or more of the exceptions set forth in § 1003.103(b)(2)(i) through (iii). If the practitioner files a timely answer and the Board determines that there is a material