§
In re J-R-G-P

7 Cited authorities

  1. Cooper v. Harris

    137 S. Ct. 1455 (2017)   Cited 210 times
    Holding that when legislators instructed the mapmaker to draw districts so that a particular district would be "a majority black district," and the mapmaker followed such instructions, that this evidence showed the announced racial target "subordinated other districting criteria"

  2. Villegas v. Mukasey

    523 F.3d 984 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 85 times
    Holding that the petitioner failed to establish a likelihood of torture where, although "a variety of evidence showed that Mexican mental patients [were] housed in terrible squalor, nothing indicate[d] that Mexican officials (or private actors to whom officials ha[d] acquiesced) created these conditions for the specific purpose of inflicting suffering upon the patients"

  3. Quijada-Aguilar v. Lynch

    799 F.3d 1303 (9th Cir. 2015)   Cited 65 times
    Holding California voluntary manslaughter is not a crime of violence, because a conviction requires "merely reckless conduct"

  4. Haile v. Holder

    658 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 49 times
    Holding that "the admission of [documents] did not violate due process," and petitioner's "challenges to the [admitted documents were] unavailing" when petitioner did "not cast doubt on the probative value or fairness of the evidence presented, nor did she present any contrary evidence to challenge the reliability of the" admitted documents

  5. Oxygene v. Lynch

    813 F.3d 541 (4th Cir. 2016)   Cited 7 times
    Adopting intent standard for CAT claims as announced in In re J-E-, 23 I. & N. Dec. 291 (B.I.A. 2002)

  6. Chavarin v. Sessions

    No. 15-73518 (9th Cir. May. 9, 2017)   Cited 1 times

    No. 15-73518 05-09-2017 JAVIER ADAME CHAVARIN, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. NOT FOR PUBLICATION Agency No. A039-805-421 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted April 7, 2017 Pasadena, California Before: M. SMITH and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and FEINERMAN, District Judge. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. The Honorable

  7. Radojkovic v. Holder

    599 F. App'x 646 (9th Cir. 2015)

    No. 11-72335 03-24-2015 DEJAN RADOJKOVIC, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. NOT FOR PUBLICATION Agency No. A028-211-730 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted February 10, 2015 San Francisco California Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and TASHIMA and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Dejan Radojkovic, a