In re Gonzalez-Camarillo

25 Cited authorities

Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council
467 U.S. 837 (1984) Cited 16,259 times 623 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
Blanchard v. Bergeron
489 U.S. 87 (1989) Cited 2,105 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that, because there is no requirement in § 1988 that attorney's fees be incurred, contingent-fee agreements do not impose an automatic ceiling on the fees amount
West Virginia Univ. Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey
499 U.S. 83 (1991) Cited 808 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the term "reasonable attorney's fee" in 42 U.S.C. § 1988 does not provide the "explicit statutory authority" required to award expert witness fees beyond those provided by §§ 1920 and 1821
K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.
486 U.S. 281 (1988) Cited 808 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute
Landon v. Plasencia
459 U.S. 21 (1982) Cited 623 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that such aliens are entitled to protections of Due Process Clause in exclusion proceedings
Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance
489 U.S. 561 (1989) Cited 267 times
Holding that creditors were not required to exhaust the Federal Home Loan Bank Board's administrative claims procedure before bringing suit against a federal bank
INS v. Phinpathya
464 U.S. 183 (1984) Cited 249 times
Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning
Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
375 U.S. 217 (1963) Cited 265 times
Holding second-step judgments reviewable "for arbitrariness and abuse of discretion"
Leng May Ma v. Barber
357 U.S. 185 (1958) Cited 213 times
Holding that an alien's parole into the United States "did not alter her status as an excluded alien"
Commissioner v. Asphalt Products Co., Inc.
482 U.S. 117 (1987) Cited 67 times
In Bourjaily v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 2275, 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987), the Court ruled that trial courts may consider the content of the statement itself when determining the admissibility of a statement under Rule 801(d)(2)(E).
Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1182 Cited 9,956 times 71 Legal Analyses
Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence
8 U.S.C. § 1255 Cited 2,911 times 6 Legal Analyses
Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists
Section 1251 - Transferred
8 U.S.C. § 1251 Cited 2,159 times 1 Legal Analyses
Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
Section 1.1 - Applicability
8 C.F.R. § 1.1 Cited 158 times
Providing that LPR status terminates upon the entry of a final order of removal
Section 212.3 - Application for the exercise of discretion under section 212(c)
8 C.F.R. § 212.3 Cited 43 times
Codifying the interpretation upheld in Castillo-Felix

In re Gonzalez-Camarillo

25 Cited authorities

Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

Holding that, because there is no requirement in § 1988 that attorney's fees be incurred, contingent-fee agreements do not impose an automatic ceiling on the fees amount

Holding that the term "reasonable attorney's fee" in 42 U.S.C. § 1988 does not provide the "explicit statutory authority" required to award expert witness fees beyond those provided by §§ 1920 and 1821

Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

Holding that such aliens are entitled to protections of Due Process Clause in exclusion proceedings

Holding that creditors were not required to exhaust the Federal Home Loan Bank Board's administrative claims procedure before bringing suit against a federal bank

Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning

Holding second-step judgments reviewable "for arbitrariness and abuse of discretion"

Holding that an alien's parole into the United States "did not alter her status as an excluded alien"

In Bourjaily v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 2275, 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987), the Court ruled that trial courts may consider the content of the statement itself when determining the admissibility of a statement under Rule 801(d)(2)(E).

Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists

Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

Providing that LPR status terminates upon the entry of a final order of removal

Codifying the interpretation upheld in Castillo-Felix

In Bourjaily v. United States, _ U.S. _, 107 S.Ct. 2275, 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987), the Court ruled that trial courts may consider the content of the statement itself when determining the admissibility of a statement under Rule 801(d)(2)(E).